Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linux: 4.9-rc5 -> 4.9-rc6 #20591

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2016
Merged

linux: 4.9-rc5 -> 4.9-rc6 #20591

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2016

Conversation

NeQuissimus
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Update

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus added 8.has: package (update) 9.needs: port to stable A PR needs a backport to the stable release. labels Nov 20, 2016
@mention-bot
Copy link

@NeQuissimus, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @thoughtpolice, @7c6f434c and @Mathnerd314 to be potential reviewers.

@fpletz fpletz removed the 9.needs: port to stable A PR needs a backport to the stable release. label Nov 21, 2016
@fpletz
Copy link
Member

fpletz commented Nov 21, 2016

@NeQuissimus I don't think we need to backport testing kernels to stable. These shouldn't be used for stable/production environments anyway. (Also noted in #20413)

Furthermore, I don't think we need PRs for these simple version bumps. They only clutter the list of PRs and are of no use because they won't get a review (as it's not needed) and you end up merging them yourself anyway. That's why you should just push them to master.

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 01172c2 into NixOS:master Nov 26, 2016
@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus deleted the linux_4_9_rc6 branch November 26, 2016 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants