-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
slop: fix build #216371
slop: fix build #216371
Conversation
Can we use fetchpatch instead? |
FindGLEW.cmake Module silently tries to include glew-config.cmake. If it succeeds, then it stop and return to the caller. However, glew-config.cmake only sets GLEW::GLEW, resulting in missing glew shared library at link time. References: * naelstrof/slop#135 * https://gitlab.exherbo.org/DanySpin97/danyspin97-exheres/-/issues/2
Result of 8 packages built:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Waiting for ofborg.
@superherointj Do you happen to know what caused this to regress off the top of your head, as it regressed very recently? No changes to our GLEW package stick out, and there's been no changes to slop other than this one. If not, I can bisect, but was just hoping you'd know :) |
Seems:
|
IIRC there were multiple packages regressing with failure to find glew, in that rebuild batch (PR #214010). |
The issue is a bit more nuanced than this patch shows. I'll see if I can find those and fix them along with this one. Thanks. |
slop: fix build
References: