Emscripten docs: reword and remove mention of nix-env
#258595
Conversation
fricklerhandwerk
force-pushed
the
doc-emscripten
branch
from
f741e13
to
43cbe9d
Compare
|
Please remove @matthewbauer as I believe they are not that active anymore in nixpkgs maintenance. I recently removed their CODEOWNER entry for other stuff. |
Taking a quick look, all of this looks like user-level documentation, so it should stay in the manual. Only contributor docs should be in the source code. |
also notify on documentation changes
in particular, remove mention of `nix-env` Co-authored by: Henrik Karlsson <i97henka@gmail.com>
that way the examples will also appear in the appendix Co-authored by: Henrik Karlsson <i97henka@gmail.com>
fricklerhandwerk
force-pushed
the
doc-emscripten
branch
from
43cbe9d
to
b2f5265
Compare
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2023-10-05-documentation-team-meeting-notes-84/33877/1 |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2023-10-05-documentation-team-meeting-notes-84/33877/3 |
|
@RaitoBezarius please recheck. |
Adding @RaitoBezarius and @matthewbauer to CODEOWNERS to keep track of changes.
really this stuff should move into the source and out of the manual, an effort recently started by @infinisil. but that would require a much larger change touching code, and we didn't want to get into that right now.