Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geos: fix package test script name #274431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Conversation

imincik
Copy link
Contributor

@imincik imincik commented Dec 15, 2023

Description of changes

Fix package test script name.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 馃憤 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@NickCao NickCao merged commit 5b8071e into master Dec 15, 2023
23 checks passed
@imincik
Copy link
Contributor Author

imincik commented Dec 15, 2023

Thanks @NickCao

imincik added a commit to imincik/geospatial-nix that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
@wegank wegank deleted the geos-fix-pkg-test-script-name branch January 3, 2024 04:25
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/week-in-geospatial-team/37035/2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants