Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hyper-haskell: init at 0.1.0.2 #27624

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2018
Merged

hyper-haskell: init at 0.1.0.2 #27624

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2018

Conversation

rvl
Copy link
Contributor

@rvl rvl commented Jul 24, 2017

Motivation for this change

Hyper Haskell is a fun little program which is a little tricky to set up in Nix. This package makes it really easy to install, and provides a hook for overriding the package set available in the environment.

Cheers!

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@rvl rvl changed the title hyper-haskell: init at 0.1.0.2 [WIP] hyper-haskell: init at 0.1.0.2 Aug 5, 2017
@rvl
Copy link
Contributor Author

rvl commented Aug 5, 2017

It's ready to go now. I have taken [WIP] off the title now that the following two things are done.

@rvl
Copy link
Contributor Author

rvl commented Aug 12, 2017

🍍 @copumpkin, would you be able to look at this? Cheers

@matthewbauer matthewbauer merged commit 5832a6f into NixOS:master Mar 22, 2018
@copumpkin
Copy link
Member

Sorry for missing this, and thanks @matthewbauer for handling it 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants