docker_25: init at 25.0.3

[jmbaur]

Description of changes

Release notes:

• https://github.com/moby/moby/releases/tag/v25.0.0
• https://github.com/moby/moby/releases/tag/v25.0.1
• https://github.com/moby/moby/releases/tag/v25.0.2
• https://github.com/moby/moby/releases/tag/v25.0.3

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[emilylange]

Cross posting #278531 (comment) because of the change to LimitNOFILE = 1048576; made in b854c8a.

[jmbaur]

Cross posting #278531 (comment) because of the change to LimitNOFILE = 1048576; made in b854c8a.

The reasoning in moby/moby#45534 (comment) sounds good to me in favor of using systemd's defaults. Removing the explicit setting of LimitNOFILE in this module.

reason to block has been resolved :)

[emilylange]

@infinisil is the failing pkgs/by-name check due to the inherit (callPackage pattern a false positive or intended?

I did not immediately spot documentation for that inherit pattern in the pkgs/by-name docs.
Though I might have missed something (on mobile rn).

[infinisil]

@infinisil is the failing pkgs/by-name check due to the inherit (callPackage pattern a false positive or intended?

False positive, please ignore, master won't break from merging like this! Am working on a fix for this :)

[infinisil]

Am working on a fix for this :)

Will be fixed with #285089

[ereslibre]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 278607 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages marked as broken and skipped:

• python312Packages.jupyter-repo2docker
• python312Packages.jupyter-repo2docker.dist

20 packages built:

• airlift
• airlift.dist
• apptainer
• apptainer-overriden-nixos
• charliecloud
• docker (docker_24)
• docker-gc
• docker-sbom
• docker_20_10
• docker_20_10.man
• docker_25
• fn-cli
• nvidia-docker
• pipework
• python311Packages.jupyter-repo2docker
• python311Packages.jupyter-repo2docker.dist
• singularity
• singularity-overriden-nixos
• udocker
• udocker.dist

[infinisil]

The PR to fix the pkgs/by-name check is now merged and used in CI, so it won't fail anymore the next time you push :)

[jmbaur]

Thanks @infinisil :)

[milas]

Updated hashes for v25.0.3

^{disclaimer: I'm a Docker Inc employee but I'm not actually a Moby maintainer}

[vdemeester]

LGTM 🐯

[bhavitsharma]

would love to see this PR merged! we're waiting on some new OCI compliant layer remote cache features.