Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

python310Packages.geopandas: 0.14.1 -> 0.14.2 #279713

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2024
Merged

python310Packages.geopandas: 0.14.1 -> 0.14.2 #279713

merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

@r-ryantm r-ryantm commented Jan 8, 2024

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from passthru.updateScript.

meta.description for python310Packages.geopandas is: Python geospatial data analysis framework

meta.homepage for python310Packages.geopandas is: https://geopandas.org

meta.changelog for python310Packages.geopandas is: https://github.com/geopandas/geopandas/blob/v0.14.2/CHANGELOG.md

Updates performed
  • Ran passthru.UpdateScript
To inspect upstream changes
Impact

Checks done

  • built on NixOS
  • The tests defined in passthru.tests, if any, passed
  • found 0.14.2 with grep in /nix/store/krf92b6ldjv3rs1wflmp18smdasx5mj0-python3.10-geopandas-0.14.2
  • found 0.14.2 in filename of file in /nix/store/krf92b6ldjv3rs1wflmp18smdasx5mj0-python3.10-geopandas-0.14.2
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand) 
14 total rebuild path(s)

14 package rebuild(s)

First fifty rebuilds by attrpath
python310Packages.bsuite
python310Packages.folium
python310Packages.geopandas
python310Packages.osmnx
python310Packages.plotnine
python310Packages.rlax
python310Packages.wktutils
python311Packages.bsuite
python311Packages.folium
python311Packages.geopandas
python311Packages.osmnx
python311Packages.plotnine
python311Packages.rlax
python311Packages.wktutils
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/krf92b6ldjv3rs1wflmp18smdasx5mj0-python3.10-geopandas-0.14.2 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A python310Packages.geopandas https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/ff793254e3116e4a9fbf651789d004a9b1ce648e.tar.gz

Or:

nix build github:r-ryantm/nixpkgs/ff793254e3116e4a9fbf651789d004a9b1ce648e#python310Packages.geopandas

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/krf92b6ldjv3rs1wflmp18smdasx5mj0-python3.10-geopandas-0.14.2
ls -la /nix/store/krf92b6ldjv3rs1wflmp18smdasx5mj0-python3.10-geopandas-0.14.2/bin

Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

Result of nixpkgs-review run on x86_64-linux 1

6 packages failed to build:
  • python310Packages.bsuite
  • python310Packages.plotnine
  • python310Packages.rlax
  • python311Packages.bsuite
  • python311Packages.plotnine
  • python311Packages.rlax
8 packages built:
  • python310Packages.folium
  • python310Packages.geopandas
  • python310Packages.osmnx
  • python310Packages.wktutils
  • python311Packages.folium
  • python311Packages.geopandas
  • python311Packages.osmnx
  • python311Packages.wktutils
Maintainer pings

cc @das-g @imincik @nh2 @nialov @r-burns @sikmir @willcohen for testing.

@sikmir
Copy link
Member

sikmir commented Jan 9, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 279713 run on x86_64-darwin 1

4 packages marked as broken and skipped:
  • python310Packages.bsuite
  • python310Packages.bsuite.dist
  • python311Packages.bsuite
  • python311Packages.bsuite.dist
12 packages failed to build:
  • python310Packages.folium
  • python310Packages.folium.dist
  • python310Packages.geopandas
  • python310Packages.geopandas.dist
  • python310Packages.osmnx
  • python310Packages.osmnx.dist
  • python310Packages.plotnine
  • python310Packages.plotnine.dist
  • python310Packages.wktutils
  • python310Packages.wktutils.dist
  • python311Packages.plotnine
  • python311Packages.plotnine.dist
8 packages built:
  • python311Packages.folium
  • python311Packages.folium.dist
  • python311Packages.geopandas
  • python311Packages.geopandas.dist
  • python311Packages.osmnx
  • python311Packages.osmnx.dist
  • python311Packages.wktutils
  • python311Packages.wktutils.dist

@imincik
Copy link
Contributor

imincik commented Jan 9, 2024

@sikmir , what's the error message for your nixpkgs-review python310Packages.geopandas failure ? I see it successfully building in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/279713/checks?check_run_id=20284486436

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/week-in-geospatial-team/37035/2

@sikmir
Copy link
Member

sikmir commented Jan 9, 2024

@sikmir , what's the error message for your nixpkgs-review python310Packages.geopandas failure ? I see it successfully building in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/279713/checks?check_run_id=20284486436

That's strange, but nix build -L .#python310Packages.geopandas is OK, while nixpkgs-review pr 279713 shows fails.

@sikmir
Copy link
Member

sikmir commented Jan 10, 2024

Failed packages are failed on master as well.

@sikmir sikmir merged commit 6dc76f8 into NixOS:master Jan 10, 2024
24 checks passed
@imincik
Copy link
Contributor

imincik commented Jan 10, 2024

Failed packages are failed on master as well.

Do you have some error messages ?

@sikmir
Copy link
Member

sikmir commented Jan 10, 2024

Just in case, it's OK on darwin:

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 279713 run on x86_64-darwin 1

4 packages marked as broken and skipped:
  • python310Packages.bsuite
  • python310Packages.bsuite.dist
  • python311Packages.bsuite
  • python311Packages.bsuite.dist
20 packages built:
  • python310Packages.folium
  • python310Packages.folium.dist
  • python310Packages.geopandas
  • python310Packages.geopandas.dist
  • python310Packages.osmnx
  • python310Packages.osmnx.dist
  • python310Packages.plotnine
  • python310Packages.plotnine.dist
  • python310Packages.wktutils
  • python310Packages.wktutils.dist
  • python311Packages.folium
  • python311Packages.folium.dist
  • python311Packages.geopandas
  • python311Packages.geopandas.dist
  • python311Packages.osmnx
  • python311Packages.osmnx.dist
  • python311Packages.plotnine
  • python311Packages.plotnine.dist
  • python311Packages.wktutils
  • python311Packages.wktutils.dist

@sikmir
Copy link
Member

sikmir commented Jan 10, 2024 •
edited

Failed packages are failed on master as well.

Do you have some error messages ?

https://hydra.nixos.org/build/245903727
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/245897391
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/245898199

@imincik
Copy link
Contributor

imincik commented Jan 10, 2024

Failed packages are failed on master as well.

Do you have some error messages ?

https://hydra.nixos.org/build/245903727 https://hydra.nixos.org/build/245897391 https://hydra.nixos.org/build/245898199

But these are plotnine, bsuite and rlax failures (which should be fixed by #275438).

What I was curious about where the geopandas failures reported in #279713 (comment)

@sikmir
Copy link
Member

sikmir commented Jan 10, 2024

What I was curious about where the geopandas failures reported in #279713 (comment)

I have no those logs now, but looks like it was some local problem, since re-build is OK (see #279713 (comment))

@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/python310Packages.geopandas branch January 10, 2024 20:06
imincik added a commit to imincik/geospatial-nix that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2024
@imincik
pkgs(python3-geopandas): 0.14.1 -> 0.14.2
5953c6e 
Nixpkgs PR:
NixOS/nixpkgs#279713
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/week-in-geospatial-team/37035/3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@willcohen willcohen Awaiting requested review from willcohen

@sikmir sikmir Awaiting requested review from sikmir

@nialov nialov Awaiting requested review from nialov

@r-burns r-burns Awaiting requested review from r-burns

@imincik imincik Awaiting requested review from imincik

@das-g das-g Awaiting requested review from das-g

@nh2 nh2 Awaiting requested review from nh2

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: python 10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@r-ryantm @sikmir @imincik @nixos-discourse