Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

init MultiQC at 1.19 #284361

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

init MultiQC at 1.19 #284361

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

edmundmiller
Copy link
Contributor

@edmundmiller edmundmiller commented Jan 27, 2024

Description of changes

Inits MultiQC and missing python packages

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 馃憤 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@edmundmiller edmundmiller marked this pull request as draft January 29, 2024 17:22
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-in-distress/3604/94

Copy link
Contributor

@doronbehar doronbehar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One reason that no body reviews this could be the fact you marked it as a draft.

@@ -42054,4 +42054,6 @@ with pkgs;
insulator2 = callPackage ../applications/misc/insulator2 {};

animdl = python3Packages.callPackage ../applications/video/animdl { };

multiqc = callPackage ../applications/science/biology/multiqc { };
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd use pkgs/by-name and avoid editing the way too large all-packages.nix.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nowadays by-name is mandatory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants