dipc: init at 1.0.0

[ByteSudoer]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[ByteSudoer]

@lolbinarycat Thank you for pointing out to those typos. Everything has been fixed as suggested.

[lolbinarycat]

few more issues

[ByteSudoer]

Fixed. It 's quite strange that the formatter could not delete out those extra empty lines. Thx again

[lolbinarycat]

ok, looks good, do you think you could squash the commits and make them fit the commit conventions?

there should be one commit adding yourself as a maintainer, and one commit adding the package.

[ByteSudoer]

@lolbinarycat I think squashing the commits would require a new pull request and that would force the rebuild on every task for the CI/CD chain. How would you recommend proceeding from here.

[lolbinarycat]

if you use git push --force it will update the existing PR (however, the old commits will disappear, so make sure everything is correct before you do)

the hard part is getting your local state setup properly, apparently this is doable with git rebase -i. personally i always ended up doing things manually with git format-patch and git am

before trying to rebase, you can use git branch -c to create a backup of the pre-rebase branch.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/3656

[quantenzitrone]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 296404 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package failed to build:

• dipc

$ nix build --nix-path nixpkgs=/home/qz/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-296404/nixpkgs nixpkgs-overlays=/tmp/tmpews7ak4l --extra-experimental-features nix-command no-url-literals --no-link --keep-going --no-allow-import-from-derivation --option build-use-sandbox relaxed -f /home/qz/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-296404/build.nix
error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/fkjxyv7lqjv0cm7h4d751qpzvb935imc-dipc-1.0.0-vendor.tar.gz.drv':
         specified: sha256-t+G8eQufZPge9vyz6jdET7PZ76eQkCyPt0m2CYzIuD0=
            got:    sha256-XQ85T64K1NLdSOtAFr0XluvFNTaHzoWKxoQtBQ+uSKQ=
error: 1 dependencies of derivation '/nix/store/7hkqac2pb5dxwr2xnqcc9ffmrnnkb85x-dipc-1.0.0.drv' failed to build
error: 1 dependencies of derivation '/nix/store/jmrn26wasxcc5kh6dlccx27l8chprigd-review-shell.drv' failed to build

[ByteSudoer]

Thx for pointing that out. It has been fixed

[quantenzitrone]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 296404 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:

• dipc

also confirmed that it works

[SuperSandro2000]

Please clean up the commit history according to the contributing guide.

[ByteSudoer]

@SuperSandro2000 I squashed the commits based on the descriptions in the contribution guidelines. Sorry for the inconvenience. I will re-request a review. Thx

fixed