-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
aerospace: init at 0.9.0-beta #299099
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
aerospace: init at 0.9.0-beta #299099
Conversation
dac8738
to
83deb8c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
formatting is a bit unusual, although i can't think of any official guidelines that are being broken for most of it.
Feel free to describe problems you faced in a new issue https://github.com/nikitabobko/AeroSpace/issues/new The process of building shouldn't be complex. GH actions builds AeroSpace without any problems https://github.com/nikitabobko/AeroSpace/actions/runs/8502224571 But besides the issues with the build setup, building the binary in nix has other flaws. I sign the binary with my private key which is needed to retain macOS accessibility permission across updates (unsigned binaries will re-request the accessibility permission on every update) |
Description of changes
Introduces aerospace - an i3 like tiling window manager for macOS. I opted to pull from built binaries as the build process is a complex one with some swift dependencies that I couldn't work through after a full days effort. Please let me know if there are any issues with this approach.
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 馃憤 reaction to pull requests you find important.