luaPackages.tree-sitter-norg: init at 0.2.4-1

[mrcjkb]

Description of changes

This will soon be a dependency of neorg.
It is also a POC for packaging tree-sitter parsers with luarocks.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[mrcjkb]

I also have tree-sitter-haskell working in one of my personal projects 🎉

[GaetanLepage]

This is very cool !

LGTM

[mrcjkb]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 309935 run on x86_64-linux 1

10 packages built:

• lua51Packages.luarocks-build-treesitter-parser
• lua51Packages.tree-sitter-norg
• lua52Packages.luarocks-build-treesitter-parser
• lua52Packages.tree-sitter-norg
• lua53Packages.luarocks-build-treesitter-parser
• lua53Packages.tree-sitter-norg
• lua54Packages.luarocks-build-treesitter-parser
• lua54Packages.tree-sitter-norg
• luajitPackages.luarocks-build-treesitter-parser
• luajitPackages.tree-sitter-norg

[teto]

seems like it needs fixing for darwin (or mark it broken). Hopefully this doesn't get picked up as a vimplugin because it's going to be confusing for users which grammar to install.

[mrcjkb]

seems like it needs fixing for darwin (or mark it broken).

I'll look into fixing it later. I think we need to use the tree-sitter CLI and clang on Darwin.

Hopefully this doesn't get picked up as a vimplugin because it's going to be confusing for users which grammar to install.

I haven't added a vimPlugin for it.
nvim-treesitter have dropped tree-sitter-norg on main though 🤷

[teto]

nvim-treesitter have dropped tree-sitter-norg on main though 🤷

and this is why the approach you take is the best !

I'll look into fixing it later. I think we need to use the tree-sitter CLI and clang on Darwin.

sounds not easy. I am fine with merging it as broken for darwin. You do a lot already, maybe let darwin users fix it ?

[mrcjkb]

sounds not easy. I am fine with merging it as broken for darwin. You do a lot already, maybe let darwin users fix it ?

luarocks-build-treesitter-parser will try to use the new tree-sitter build command if it detects a tree-sitter CLI installation,
so it shouldn't be too hard to get it working.

I've just pushed a change that ought to fix it for darwin 🤞

[mrcjkb]

🤔 no idea how it works on Darwin in the other luarocks-build-treesitter-parser workflow, but not here.
Guess I'll have to mark it as broken for now...