caligula: init at 0.4.5

[sodiboo]

Description of changes

Caligula is a user-friendly, lightweight TUI for disk imaging.

https://github.com/ifd3f/caligula

While it works on my machine, which is an x86_64-linux, Caligula also supports macOS. I've copied the required frameworks from the official flake, but it is important to note that i do not own an {x86_64,aarch64}-darwin machine to test on.

cc @ifd3f; you said on mastodon that you were interested in also maintaining the package? can you test that it works on macOS?

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[ifd3f]

@sodiboo yes, I can add myself as a maintainer in separate PR.

I've tested and it builds and runs on x86_64-darwin and aarch64-darwin, although it has that bug that prevents it from being used on disks in MacOS Sonoma. Wonder if it's possible to mark those versions as broken for now?

[sodiboo]

it has that bug that prevents it from being used on disks in MacOS Sonoma

is that a bug upstream? or indirectly introduced by this package, specifically?

Wonder if it's possible to mark those versions as broken for now?

That seems to be possible. From the manual:

If a program ought to work on a certain platform, but doesn’t, the platform should be included in meta.platforms, but marked as broken with e.g. meta.broken = !hostPlatform.isWindows.

I didn't include meta.platforms because i didn't understand it (and my attempts at using it resulted in build failures), but i looked through some other packages now and found out how to actually use it lol. I can add the correct platforms and also mark it as broken on darwin

[sodiboo]

is that a bug upstream? or indirectly introduced by this package, specifically?

actually i Looked At Your Issues™ and found it's ifd3f/caligula#105, right?

[ifd3f]

actually i Looked At Your Issues™ and found it's ifd3f/caligula#105, right?

Yes, that's the one.