-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pythonPackages.pyzmq: use zeromq4 #49533
Conversation
@GrahamcOfBorg build python2.pkgs.pyzmq python3.pkgs.pyzmq |
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: python2.pkgs.pyzmq, python3.pkgs.pyzmq Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: python2.pkgs.pyzmq, python3.pkgs.pyzmq Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: python2.pkgs.pyzmq, python3.pkgs.pyzmq Partial log (click to expand)
|
The darwin failure is a regression. @GrahamcOfBorg build python3.pkgs.pyzmq |
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: python3.pkgs.pyzmq Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: python3.pkgs.pyzmq Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: python3.pkgs.pyzmq Partial log (click to expand)
|
There we go. I'll leave this open for a while in case anybody has a reason to stay with |
Motivation for this change
I can't find any reason anymore to use
zeromq4
.nix-review
shows two failures:python3.pkgs.robotframework-tools
andzeromq4-haskell
. Both of those also fail without this commit. I'd mark them as broken, but the first would introduce a merge conflict with #49434 and I couldn't find out where the second is actually defined.Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)