libpcap: 1.8.1 -> 1.9.0

[locallycompact]

Motivation for this change

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

[c0bw3b]

Hello and thanks for the contribution.
Please take a peek at the contributing doc and the manual for PR guidelines.
Check-boxes in the PR template are helpful for review, for example to indicate a local build has been tested on a given platform with/without sandboxing.

Your commit short message should be: libpcap: 1.8.1 -> 1.9.0
Also in this instance, this is going to rebuild a good number of packages (500+ on Linux) so the PR should be targeted at the staging branch.
One last nitpick while we're at it: meta.homepage could be updated to https://www.tcpdump.org

[c0bw3b]

Changelog for 1.9.0:
https://www.tcpdump.org/libpcap-changes.txt
(no security-related fix AFAICT)

/cc @fpletz as maintainer

[c0bw3b]

@GrahamcOfBorg eval

[c0bw3b]

@GrahamcOfBorg build libpcap

[c0bw3b]

I also get a SHA2-256 hash of 06bhydl4vr4z9c3vahl76f2j96z1fbrcl7wwismgs4sris08inrf locally so I'll correct it. It's possible upstream re-released the tarball.

[c0bw3b]

@GrahamcOfBorg build libpcap