eternal-terminal: 5.1.10 -> 6.0.4

[qolii]

Motivation for this change

Simple version bump.

Tested working between two NixOS machines (client/server).

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Notify maintainers

cc @

[c0bw3b]

@qolii it seems v6.0.4 was released in the meantime, with some bugfixes.

[qolii]

it seems v6.0.4 was released in the meantime, with some bugfixes

Thanks! Bumped.

[c0bw3b]

@GrahamcOfBorg build eternal-terminal

[c0bw3b]

I can build and run etserver v6.0.4 properly on my end (nixos).
But ofBorg's Darwin failure seems to be a regression.

[qolii]

@c0bw3b, can you explain further? I don't know how ofBorg works!

FWIW, I just ran

NIX_PATH="nixpkgs=https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/archive/4b2f7063f617bcc0eb50de19f660a4f9a50a1488.tar.gz" nix-shell -p eternal-terminal

on my Mac, and everything works as expected (connecting to a NixOS et server).

[c0bw3b]

How ofBorg builds is explained on its readme
To try and reproduce the build failure on a mac, you may also use nix-review

In this instance, I think it's just that ninja isn't really recommended to build. Plain cmake will do just fine.

[c0bw3b]

So closing in favor of #71915
(doesn't prevent you to update it in the future and notify maintainers :) )