Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixes #18614: Solaris fails to build on 6.2 #2385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 18, 2020
Merged

Fixes #18614: Solaris fails to build on 6.2 #2385

merged 1 commit into from Nov 18, 2020

Conversation

peckpeck
Copy link
Member

@Normation-Quality-Assistant
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is not mergeable to upper versions.
Since it is "Ready for merge" you must merge it by yourself using the following command:
rudder-dev merge https://github.com/Normation/rudder-packages/pull/2385
-- Your faithful QA
Kant merge: "It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience."
(https://ci.normation.com/jenkins/job/merge-accepted-pr/32731/console)

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated with a new commit

@Normation-Quality-Assistant
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is not mergeable to upper versions.
Since it is "Ready for merge" you must merge it by yourself using the following command:
rudder-dev merge https://github.com/Normation/rudder-packages/pull/2385
-- Your faithful QA
Kant merge: "It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience."
(https://ci.normation.com/jenkins/job/merge-accepted-pr/32742/console)

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

OK, squash merging this PR

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the bug_18614/solaris_fails_to_build_on_6_2 branch from c0f4abf to af71ce8 Compare November 18, 2020 14:31
@peckpeck peckpeck merged commit af71ce8 into Normation:branches/rudder/6.2 Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@amousset amousset amousset approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
qa: Can't merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@peckpeck @Normation-Quality-Assistant @amousset