Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 5889/dev/service management on windows #589

Conversation

ncharles
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ncharles ncharles force-pushed the bug_5889/dev/service_management_on_windows branch from 45e5080 to 8bfd39b Compare November 30, 2014 21:07
@@ -105,6 +110,7 @@ necessary and kill undesired processes.
<SELECT1>
<NAME>PROCESS_MANAGED_KILLING_METHOD</NAME>
<DESCRIPTION>When stopping this process</DESCRIPTION>
<LONGDESCRIPTION>This parameter is not used on Windows system</LONGDESCRIPTION>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

systemS (with an S)

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

This looks good aside from typos. However, we'll need to prepare an equivalent patch for version 3.0 of this Technique on the 3.0 branch. Could you do that soon, so that we can merge the two together please?

@ncharles ncharles force-pushed the bug_5889/dev/service_management_on_windows branch from 8bfd39b to 868e881 Compare December 8, 2014 10:11
@ncharles
Copy link
Member Author

ncharles commented Dec 8, 2014

PR updated

@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ necessary and kill undesired processes.
<OS version=">= 4 (Etch)">Debian</OS>
<OS version=">= 4 (Nahant)">RHEL / CentOS</OS>
<OS version=">= 10 SP1 (Agama Lizard)">SuSE LES / DES / OpenSuSE</OS>
<AGENT version=">= 3.2">cfengine-community</AGENT>
<OS version=">= 2003">Windows</OS>
<AGENT version=">= 3.5">cfengine-community</AGENT>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also add a line for cfengine-enterprise.

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

Great! I added one more comment (I missed that originally, sorry). What about the PR for the 3.0 branch?

@ncharles
Copy link
Member Author

ncharles commented Dec 8, 2014

the PR for branch 3.0 is harder than expected, all the code changed :/

@ncharles
Copy link
Member Author

ncharles commented Dec 8, 2014

i'll need some more time to do it in 3.0, as i need to bring the windows infra up to date with 3.0beta to correctly test

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

OK... But could you already open the PR (and a ticket, obviously) with what you think will work for the 3.0 branch? I'm really worried this will get forgotten.

@ncharles
Copy link
Member Author

ncharles commented Dec 8, 2014

the ticket is already open, but i can't make the pr yet

@ncharles
Copy link
Member Author

ncharles commented Dec 8, 2014

ok, for the branch 3.0, most of the code has to go to ncf, as it rely on ncf generic methods

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

Great! That will improve ncf and probably make this PR a lot simpler too.

@ncharles ncharles force-pushed the bug_5889/dev/service_management_on_windows branch from 868e881 to 51c02dd Compare December 10, 2014 13:07
@ncharles
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

The PR is now in #609

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

Since #609 is looking good, let's backport the latest technique version from the 3.0 branch to 2.11.

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

Replaced by #611

@jooooooon jooooooon closed this Dec 11, 2014
amousset pushed a commit to amousset/rudder-techniques that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2015
…x_missing_then_in_ldap_postinst

Fixes #6120: Add a missing 'then' in rudder-inventory-ldap postinstall s...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants