Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Striparr Integration #296

Open
DrSeussFreak opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Striparr Integration #296

DrSeussFreak opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@DrSeussFreak
Copy link

Striparr is an amazing tool for stripping metadata, and it is all API driven. It CAN log when you run manually on something, so I wondered if there may be a possibility to leverage the API to get logging?

@austinwbest
Copy link
Member

Striparr is an amazing tool for stripping metadata, and it is all API driven. It CAN log when you run manually on something, so I wondered if there may be a possibility to leverage the API to get logging?

Is this something the log watcher can monitor with regexp matches? If not, does it support webhooks?

@DrSeussFreak
Copy link
Author

It runs as a webhook, similar to notifiarr you add it to the same place in sonarr/radarr

@austinwbest
Copy link
Member

No, I meant it emitting webhooks

@DrSeussFreak
Copy link
Author

DrSeussFreak commented Oct 22, 2023

ahh ok.

*arr app sends post call to striparr with the file path, striparr requires access to the same file paths for the media as the *arr apps, so it is one-way communication from *arr --> striparr --> direct access to media files

In fact you can manually run striparr via docker cli to run it on demand

@austinwbest
Copy link
Member

i get that part but does striparr have webhook options?

onStart, onComplete, onError etc is what would be the ideal solution

@DrSeussFreak
Copy link
Author

been a really long day 🤦🏻‍♂️

It does not appear to have any options externally available, but I do see a newer function for email alerting, so there must be something internal.

@austinwbest
Copy link
Member

I would ask them if they could add very simple json webhook support. you put in a URL and it posts json to it instead of an email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants