You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of just sending the next expected marker and the behavior, send the full list of markers until the next block, with markers tagged if they have a role in the block, and also send the expected behaviour (stop in block / pass the block)
That way, if something changes (can't pass anymore) we just have to send the new behavior and the train itself knows whether it should have slowed down by now and correct for it.
All other solutions are unreliable since we don't know for sure if the train already passed a specific marker or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
when the train passes, we could already send the instructions for the next leg, which should be buffered by the train (it still needs to finish the previous instructions).
Instead of just sending the next expected marker and the behavior, send the full list of markers until the next block, with markers tagged if they have a role in the block, and also send the expected behaviour (stop in block / pass the block)
That way, if something changes (can't pass anymore) we just have to send the new behavior and the train itself knows whether it should have slowed down by now and correct for it.
All other solutions are unreliable since we don't know for sure if the train already passed a specific marker or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: