You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I assume that it is invalid for an object to have more than one object conformance declaration, yes? Do you want to add language to that effect so that it can have an error code or should the generic E001 just be used?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that there should be exactly one object conformance declaration.
I don't see enough value in adding an extra error code for this case but we could change wording to include it in an existing code. Could be E001 by being more explicit about files/dirs allowed, or E002 by changing first sentence of the Object Conformance Declaration section.
Discussion on 2022-04-13 community call: We agree that there should be additional wording at the object and storage root level. Perhaps the easiest would be to add into E003 and E076 conditions, each the second sentence of the respective description.
I assume that it is invalid for an object to have more than one object conformance declaration, yes? Do you want to add language to that effect so that it can have an error code or should the generic
E001
just be used?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: