New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
import and refine OBI 'disease stage' #105
Comments
As what OGMS have discussed, it is kind of achieved agreement that 'disease course' is a biological process. If so, 'disease stage' is also a biological process. |
A class for As pointed out in #117, the IRI is badly formed. But, as discussed above, the class IRI should be adopted from OBI and OGMS given curation duties. @zhengj2007 'disease course', and presumably 'disease stage', are not biological processes. These should be seen more as aggregates of biological processes. An aggregate of things of the same type does not imply the aggregate itself is of the same type. The aggregate of marbles in a pouch is not a marble. Seven baseball games are not a baseball game, but they are a world series. |
Currently fixing IRIs and this came to my attention. Should I use the OBI IRI or would that cause an up stream collision in OBO, etc? |
As part of the plans to revise
relapse
andremission
(see #104) and to align OBI and OGMS, it is being proposed that OGMS take responsibility for OBI 'disease stage`. The IRI will be maintained and OBI would import it back once we come to agreement on a definition and metadata.Currently:
disease stage
= a part of an occurrence of a disease process which is associated with position in the normal progression of the diseasesubclass of
biological process
Proposed revision:
disease stage
= a process which is a temporal part of some disease coursesubclass of
process
part_of some
disease course
example of usage: Stage IV of Hodgkin disease, Stage 2 prodrome of schizophrenia, Braak Stage II
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: