Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

range loop refactoring #2845

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2023
Merged

range loop refactoring #2845

merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2023

Conversation

Joilnen
Copy link
Contributor

@Joilnen Joilnen commented May 24, 2023

No description provided.

@Joilnen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Joilnen commented May 24, 2023

could we to pass the project to C++17 and to use for_each(std::execution::par,,) ?

@paroj
Copy link
Member

paroj commented May 25, 2023

could we to pass the project to C++17 and to use for_each(std::execution::par,,) ?

I try to keep Ogre1 conservative in regards to C++, thats why master only switched from C++11 to C++14, so C++17 will take a while.

However note that using parallel for here would make the code actually slower

@paroj paroj merged commit d71bf97 into OGRECave:master May 25, 2023
@Joilnen Joilnen deleted the fix_39 branch June 12, 2023 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Joilnen @paroj