[measurement table] missing unit_source_concept_id

[parisni]

Hi

according to this http://forums.ohdsi.org/t/store-original-and-transformed-unit-in-measurement/4348/3
it is necessary to add the unit_source_concept_id

[clairblacketer]

Thanks @parisni. I will need a proposal drawn up so we can discuss at a CDM workgroup meeting. This template helps organize the request, use cases, etc.

[vojtechhuser]

There is a larger consideration. If we store super nicely the original units (and we converted the value), we may think about storing the original value
(if I converted pounds to kg - there is source value as number as well). Where do we stop?

[parisni]

hi @vojtechhuser

Where do we stop?

From a implementer perspective, I am not very comfortable to lose local informations (such original value).
For a standard analyst perspective, I agree it does not matter whether such local code exist or not.

Please keep in mind that OMOP is also a model for internal use and also local codes are used a lot. If this aspect is lost, the model would lose interest in my opinion.

This is why I am asking for extending consistency and keep the local code in the model.

[cgreich]

@parisni:

No stress. We are not going to drop the source values and source concepts. What Vojtech is looking at is to standardize the measurements, so they are all in the same standard units. That will require conversion. From a analytic perspective, even local, this would be a very nice achievement. Actually, particularly locally, because most institutions use more than one clinical lab, and they all spit out whatever jibberish they want. To get that under control would be a true strong suite of the CDM.

[vojtechhuser]

I will reply on forum

[vojtechhuser]

hmmm. what about 5 ft 1 inch..... (OMG) I doubt there is CID for that and not sure I would love to create it. (but we may have to).

[clairblacketer]

Hi @parisni this issue has been added to the June 4th CDM workgroup meeting

[parisni]

hi @clairblacketer thanks. I will add several related issues soon and hope all the stuff will be discussed

[clairblacketer]

Hi @parisni and @vojtechhuser June 4th meeting of the CDM workgroup has moved to June 11 because of the Cleveland F2F. Agenda can be found here.

[parisni]

hi @clairblacketer thanks a lot !

[vojtechhuser]

Here is the conclusion. We hope to add a column. Moving this Themis issue back to here since Themis is now terminated.

PROBLEM: original data can not be stored fully

FORUM: see forum link here #259

SOLUTION:
add new column to CDM unit_source_concept_id (optional) this is representation of unit_source_value as concept_id
(data type as all other CIDs, optional)

[vojtechhuser]

Why is this urgent: We want to convert weight in lb into kg. In order to document that the original data was in lb, we need this field. This will allow much greater standardization of measurement data.

[clairblacketer]

Labelled as documentation for the 2021 CDM Hackathon

Final Decision

The field UNIT_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID needs to be added to the MEASUREMENT table.

[NACHC-CAD]

@aandryc: @NACHC-CAD (John Gresh) will take this one at the hackathon.