-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To-do list for release 2013.02 #118
Comments
How about having each 'thing' as separate issues, and then this as an 'index' which points to everything that remains? For instance, I can refer to the issues:
|
Dune manages its releases this way using flyspray: you can define "depends on" relations for issues, thus having "tracker bugs" for releases. By coincidence there is also an OPM flyspray instance ;) at http://opm-project.org/flyspray (I'm in no way offended if it does not get used, though.) |
@atgeirr is the release numbered conventionally now (i.e. N.M)? I thought we went for YYYY.N. I'm just wondering, but I'm perfectly okay with both schemes... |
We did decide to go for YYYY.N and I think we should stick to this. |
I think issue #113 is a release blocker. |
@andlaus: I think the github issue tracker should be good enough (and is already in use), so that we do not need (a.t.m.) to use the flyspray. The biggest problem with github issue tracking is that all issues are associated with a single repo, but I think it is workable, |
I agree, the issue tracker at github is working out quite well. My only concern on this now is that it may be difficult to migrate the history here to a new tracker should that be desirable (i.e., lock-in to github). However, I think we have other more important things to address at this point in time. |
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:24:23AM -0800, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
This lock-in kind of holds for other issue trackers, too. At DUNE we |
|
OpenRS? This is not a big issue, but I see that many of the older files e.g. dune-cornerpoint/dune/grid/CpGrid.hpp contain reference to OpenRS. "This file is part of The Open Reservoir Simulator Project (OpenRS)". Should this be changed to OPM? |
All of this should change to OPM, yes. |
@alfbr Apparently others have considered migration of issues before: https://github.com/sorich87/github-to-bitbucket-issues-migration |
I will do the same for dune-cornerpoint etc. |
As it turns out, this issue was not used for keeping track of the release process. I'll close it and think about how we can improve the release process for future releases. |
This is an attempt to collect various things that must be done/fixed before we can do a release. Alternatively, we may post each separate thing as an issue, please state your opinion!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: