-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transaction details of accepting multiple currencies in a crowdsale #249
Comments
@dexX7 @m21 @dacoinminster The next paragraph in that section says:
The last sentence in that paragraph was supposed to be clear, but maybe it isn't or it gets overlooked. The reason for having those values=0 is to prevent the tx51 from being interpreted as a new crowdsale if for some reason the active one had been closed. We haven't been consistent in how tx's are updated or cancelled. Tx20 has an Action field, tx51 is as described above for updates (w/ tx53 to close/cancel a crowdsale). A common, clear approach would go a long way toward eliminating confusion and uncertainty. @dexX7 Per the second paragraph of https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/spec#new-property-creation-via-crowdsale-with-variable-number-of-tokens the starting block number is still TBD, if that answers your question about tx51 v1 being live. |
Hey @marv-engine, thanks for the reply. The question, if it's live was related to the current mastercore master on testnet and @m21 mentioned that it's "live for months", but it turned out there was a misunderstanding. The quoted part is nevertheless indeed what appears confusing to me, because I'm unsure what it actually means. Validity requirements are mentioned and the base definition states a few things such as The confusing part for me derives from In general I think being as explicit as possible should be aimed for, so instead of saying "this or that applies", I'd list what exactly applies here. Would you mind to post a complete example please, because I'm still not 100 % sure how it would be done? :) Edit:
Is it too late to do so, given that it's not live nor even implemented? Edit:
|
The spec states:
So my interpretation was:
Whereby @m21 said:
@marv-engine @dacoinminster:
Seems like this is a bit unclear - at least for me. Would welcome a clarification on this topic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: