Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[java] fix deprecation warnings #8969

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2021
Merged

[java] fix deprecation warnings #8969

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2021

Conversation

wing328
Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 commented Mar 14, 2021

  • Fix deprecation warnings for RequestBody.create()
  • Fix deprecation warnings in JSON.java

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 5.1.x, 6.0.x
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

cc @bbdouglas (2017/07) @sreeshas (2017/08) @jfiala (2017/08) @lukoyanov (2017/09) @cbornet (2017/09) @jeff9finger (2018/01) @karismann (2019/03) @Zomzog (2019/04) @lwlee2608 (2019/10) @nmuesch (2021/01)

@auto-labeler
Copy link

auto-labeler bot commented Mar 14, 2021

👍 Thanks for opening this issue!
🏷 I have applied any labels matching special text in your issue.

The team will review the labels and make any necessary changes.

@wing328 wing328 added the Enhancement: Code Cleanup General refactoring, removal of deprecated things, commenting, etc. label Mar 14, 2021
@wing328 wing328 added this to the 5.1.0 milestone Mar 14, 2021
@@ -1011,18 +1011,18 @@ public class ApiClient {
public RequestBody serialize(Object obj, String contentType) throws ApiException {
if (obj instanceof byte[]) {
// Binary (byte array) body parameter support.
return RequestBody.create(MediaType.parse(contentType), (byte[]) obj);
return RequestBody.create((byte[]) obj, MediaType.parse(contentType));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So far as I can tell, this has introduced a regression in the Java generator - see #9151.

toby-murray-snow-software added a commit to toby-murray-snow-software/openapi-generator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2021
In 5.0.1 the generated line in `ApiClient` was:
```
return RequestBody.create(MediaType.parse(contentType), (byte[]) obj);
```
in 5.1.0 it is:
```
return RequestBody.create((byte[]) obj, MediaType.parse(contentType));
```

Looks like this change was introduced in OpenAPITools#8969, and requires a more recent version of OkHttp to compile in some (all?) circumstances.
wing328 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2021
In 5.0.1 the generated line in `ApiClient` was:
```
return RequestBody.create(MediaType.parse(contentType), (byte[]) obj);
```
in 5.1.0 it is:
```
return RequestBody.create((byte[]) obj, MediaType.parse(contentType));
```

Looks like this change was introduced in #8969, and requires a more recent version of OkHttp to compile in some (all?) circumstances.
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ public class ApiClient {
reqBody = null;
} else {
// use an empty request body (for POST, PUT and PATCH)
reqBody = RequestBody.create(MediaType.parse(contentType), "");
reqBody = RequestBody.create("", MediaType.parse(contentType));
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why has this been swapped?
I'm getting errors that there is no such method signature found in okhttp client 4.9.1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Client: Java Enhancement: Code Cleanup General refactoring, removal of deprecated things, commenting, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants