New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Commits on 1.9.3.x that are not on 1.9.4.x #2184
Conversation
* solve longstanding order shortcoming (so actual coupon code on order view) solve longstanding order shortcoming (so actual coupon code on order view in adminhtml) now our logistics see the description @ totals overview: but have to ask the customer: which code was it? esp. handy when using generated codes simple fix: please improve if you think this can be done better. Breaks nothing, quickwin for admin users * Sloppy missed clsoing div * Updated string * Add coupon code translations * Update Mage_Adminhtml.csv * Added coupon code * Escape coupon code and description in template. Co-authored-by: Colin Mollenhour <colin@mollenhour.com>
remove password from account_new email template
* Update shipping.phtml Wrong translation field fix * Fixed typo Co-authored-by: sv3n <github-sr@hotmail.com>
Nice find but you closed the PR. Are those commits merged in latest OM? Did we miss others? |
I don't think there could be something merge in older branches (older than 1.9.3) but I closed it because, at this point in time, it could be dangerous to merge some commits from milion years ago just because we found them. |
Can we revert and leave them open for discussions? Or shall we recreate them? |
anyone can cherry-pick one any comment into another branch |
I will let someone more advanced in Git to do this task. If you can do it would be great because you know what it's about. The most important thing is not to lose them and to capitalize the efforts made in the past if they are still relevant. |
Since github doesn't allow to dismiss the "compare & pull request" button I've to create this PR. I will close it right away since no commit in the 1.9.3.x branch should be ported to 1.9.4.x at this point in time.
We should probably freeze old branches if possible