PQCA Content Review Group

[Naomi-Wash]

I'd like to create a content review group so that when blogs, press releases, social posts, etc. are submitted there is a defined group of community members who will review the content and approve it.

I think we need the group members to consist of:

1. PQCA Staff member(s)
2. PQCA Technical community member(s)
3. PQCA Outreach Committee member(s)

We can set guidelines, but I'd suggest one person from each of the categories approves.

If you are interested in being a reviewer, please comment below.

[brian-jarvis-aws]

I’m interested in this

[planetf1]

Happy to help out here too

[baentsch]

If you are interested in the perspective of a non-LinuxFoundation person on such content, feel free to let me know.

[Naomi-Wash]

@baentsch, we welcome it. There are other non-LF reviewers as well. I'll add you to the group. Can you please provide me with your email? You can message me in the Discord channel privately: username naomiwash_lf

[maximilien]

interested here as well. Could this part of the #8 documentation working group

[baentsch]

@baentsch, we welcome it. There are other non-LF reviewers as well. I'll add you to the group. Can you please provide me with your email? You can message me in the Discord channel privately: username naomiwash_lf

@Naomi-Wash I'm not on Discord as I don't like it's contractual t's and c's. But I'm curious as to what you can see on my GH profile? Is the reference to my homepage (not) accessible to you? On that my (public) email address is listed.

[Naomi-Wash]

@maximilien I think the documentation working group is more for technical items/processes.
This content review group is more marketing-centric (eg. blog posts, white papers, etc.)

@baentsch I can see your homepage and grabbed your email.

I'll add you both to the email list.

[planetf1]

It may be useful to focus the discussion in a github discussion? - whether here (we could add a new category), or in a discussion specific to that workgroup

[Naomi-Wash]

@planetf1 To clarify, you would like to move the Content Review Group to a discussion? Please note that this isn't a working group, just rather an email list with interested parties.

[planetf1]

@Naomi-Wash no... it was just in reference to the point above about discord

[planetf1]

@KennyPaul What is the current status of the content review group?
Could it just be a group on https://lists.pqca.org/groups ?
Or if it needs control, we could make it an access group & use github for approvals (via a specific file/dir owned by codeowners, or a repo) - but this may be unnecessary overhead?