Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relaunch the project #12

Closed
pavel-kirienko opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Relaunch the project #12

pavel-kirienko opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@pavel-kirienko
Copy link
Member

As I have indicated earlier, I want to rename this project in order to avoid confusion with FOC-enabled PX4ESC. The current name px4esc-bldc is not a good choice as it doesn't reflect the idea of the project.

The master branch of this repository will be rolled back to the point where the branch pixhawk_esc_1.4 has been created, and then the latter will become the new master. Pixhawk ESC v1.4 will become the official reference hardware design (although a few fixes won't hurt as long as they don't affect backward compatibility).

@LorenzMeier any feedback?

@LorenzMeier
Copy link
Member

Thanks! I think we need a new repo name for this repo which reflects the lite / simple / minimal (valenok-ish) nature of this codebase in comparison to the official PX4 ESC codebase.

@pavel-kirienko
Copy link
Member Author

No no no it's not valenok-ish, it's more complex. Here's the complexity chart:

Valenok -- (this repo) -- PX4ESC with FOC

I would suggest galosha, but anybody speaking Russian would not take this seriously.

@heluozhijian
Copy link

Hi, all
How can I found the hardware of px4esc, please? Thank you!

@pavel-kirienko
Copy link
Member Author

I think we need a new repo name for this repo which reflects the lite / simple / minimal (valenok-ish) nature of this codebase in comparison to the official PX4 ESC codebase.

Okay, how about Sapog. I will rename it right away if everyone is fine with it.

@LorenzMeier
Copy link
Member

i'll go with whatever you feel makes most sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants