Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

flower #160

Closed
planteome-user opened this issue Sep 8, 2010 · 6 comments
Closed

flower #160

planteome-user opened this issue Sep 8, 2010 · 6 comments

Comments

@planteome-user
Copy link

Flower (PO: 0009046) current defintions: A heterosporangiate strobilus, typically consisting of androecium, gynoecium, usually surrounded by a perianth and borne on an axis or receptacle.

One of the reviewers pointed out that the definition was problematic.

At the POC meeting on 9/8/2010, We agreed that it was inaccurate and needed to be fixed before the release.

Proposed definition: A determinate shoot system that has as a part at least one carpel or at least one stamen and does not contain any other determinate shoot system as a part.
Comment: may be have as part one or more petals, sepals or tepals.
Child of shoot system

Reported by: rlwalls2008

Original Ticket: obo/plant-ontology-po-term-requests/160

@planteome-user
Copy link
Author

from POC meeting on 9-15-10:

New proposed definition: A determinate reproductive shoot system that has as part at least one carpel or at least one stamen and does not contain any other determinate shoot system as a part.

Comment: may have as part one or more petals, sepals or tepals. May contain pistillode or staminode or other aborted organs that don't show up in mature form.

Should be is_a reproductive shoot system, but we don't currently have that terms. Should we add it now or wait for next round?

Original comment by: rlwalls2008

@planteome-user
Copy link
Author

We can't make this a child of reproductive shoot system, because the term doesn't exist.

I think having the word reproductive in the definition is redundant, because it is already implied by the presence of a carpel or stamen. Also, some flowers are sterile, and not involved in reproduction. Instead we can keep the original comment: "The characteristic reproductive structure of angiosperms."

Original comment by: rlwalls2008

@planteome-user
Copy link
Author

On the live version of the PO, floret (sensu Asteraceae) is listed as a synonym of flower. Shouldn't this be a narrow synonym of inflorescence?

Original comment by: rlwalls2008

@planteome-user
Copy link
Author

At POC meeting on 9-22-10, we accepted the proposed definition from 9-15-10, using new term reproductive shoot system as parent.

Original comment by: rlwalls2008

@planteome-user
Copy link
Author

This def'n was fixed, (see below) so I am closing this tracker.
Current Def'n: Flower (PO:0009046):
A determinate reproductive shoot system that has as part at least one carpel or at least one stamen and does not contain any other determinate shoot system as a part. [source:POC:curators]

Original comment by: cooperl09

@planteome-user
Copy link
Author

----does not contain any other determinate
shoot system as a part. [source:POC:curators]

If I am not wrong, it should be
"--does not contain any other INdeterminate"
----------------------------------------------^^

Original comment by: jaiswalp

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant