Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

recursor: needs counters for DNSSEC status #3916

Closed
pieterlexis opened this issue May 30, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

recursor: needs counters for DNSSEC status #3916

pieterlexis opened this issue May 30, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement feature request rec
Milestone
rec-4.0.x

Comments

@pieterlexis
Copy link
Contributor

i.e. one counter per DNSSEC state we determine (Secure, Insecure, Bogus, Indeterminate, Negative Trust Anchor).
@pieterlexis pieterlexis added this to the rec-4.0.1 milestone May 30, 2016
pieterlexis added a commit to pieterlexis/pdns that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2016
@pieterlexis
Recursor: Add DNSSEC validation statistics
c7bf5b4 
Closes PowerDNS#3916
@pieterlexis pieterlexis mentioned this issue Jun 30, 2016
Merged
pieterlexis added a commit to pieterlexis/pdns that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2016
@pieterlexis
Recursor: Add DNSSEC validation statistics
a5e4f02 
Closes PowerDNS#3916
pieterlexis added a commit to pieterlexis/pdns that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2016
@pieterlexis
Recursor: Add DNSSEC validation statistics
fb9b270 
Closes PowerDNS#3916
pieterlexis added a commit to pieterlexis/pdns that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2016
@pieterlexis
Recursor: Add DNSSEC validation statistics
8180a23 
Closes PowerDNS#3916
pieterlexis added a commit to pieterlexis/pdns that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2016
@pieterlexis
Recursor: Add DNSSEC validation statistics
849fe8d 
Closes PowerDNS#3916
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement feature request rec
Projects
None yet
Milestone
rec-4.0.x
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pieterlexis