Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of experimental features in Modules not built in repo needs to be maintained #10550

Closed
TravisEz13 opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
Area-Maintainers-Build specific to affecting the build Issue-Enhancement the issue is more of a feature request than a bug Resolution-Fixed The issue is fixed.

Comments

@TravisEz13
Copy link
Member

TravisEz13 commented Sep 16, 2019

During the official build the modules are restored during packaging so build.psm1 cannot enumerate the experimentalfeatures

List of experimental features in Modules not built in repo needs to be maintained.

Code to get list:

Get-Module -ListAvailable | Where-Object {$_.Path -like "${pshome}*"} | Select-Object -ExpandProperty ExperimentalFeatures | Select-Object -ExpandProperty Name
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 added the Issue-Question ideally support can be provided via other mechanisms, but sometimes folks do open an issue to get a label Sep 16, 2019
@iSazonov iSazonov added the Area-Maintainers-Build specific to affecting the build label May 7, 2020
@iSazonov
Copy link
Collaborator

iSazonov commented May 7, 2020

@TravisEz13 Is the issue actual or we can close?

@TravisEz13
Copy link
Member Author

Actual issue:

@("PSDesiredStateConfiguration.InvokeDscResource") | ForEach-Object {

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 added Issue-Enhancement the issue is more of a feature request than a bug and removed Issue-Question ideally support can be provided via other mechanisms, but sometimes folks do open an issue to get a labels May 12, 2020
@daxian-dbw
Copy link
Member

For release builds the experimental features are now coming from the pre-generated files:

  • experimental-feature-windows.json
  • experimental-feature-linux.json

It's done by #16823 and #16837.
Given the above, this can be closed now.

@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw added the Resolution-Fixed The issue is fixed. label Nov 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Maintainers-Build specific to affecting the build Issue-Enhancement the issue is more of a feature request than a bug Resolution-Fixed The issue is fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants