Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Vanilla" windows investigation #148

Closed
laxamanaj opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

"Vanilla" windows investigation #148

laxamanaj opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rpodcast @robertdevine @laxamanaj
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request fda pilots Link Summary of Pilots and Pilot4 blog post outputs submission process

Comments

@laxamanaj
Copy link
Collaborator

For this issue, there is not much needed action from us, but I'm noting it here as this came up for @rpodcast @robertdevine and myself to discuss the "Vanilla" windows specification approach, which can then be used as a foundation for future submissions to follow. This way both the sponsor and FDA reviewers can align with analysis environments to prepare when submitting and receiving eSUB packages using R.
image
@laxamanaj laxamanaj added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 7, 2024
@robertdevine robertdevine added enhancement New feature or request outputs submission process fda pilots Link Summary of Pilots and Pilot4 blog post labels May 19, 2024
@bms63 bms63 mentioned this issue May 30, 2024
Open
@bms63 bms63 closed this as completed May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rpodcast rpodcast

@robertdevine robertdevine

@laxamanaj laxamanaj

Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request fda pilots Link Summary of Pilots and Pilot4 blog post outputs submission process
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@rpodcast @robertdevine @bms63 @laxamanaj