Add Py 3.10 to testing envs

[nicholascar]

Add testing for Python 3.10

Replaces the closed PR #1439

Needed for PR #1450

[aucampia]

The problem you are seeing here is because of #1455

It may be best to just switch from isodate to isodate2.

I have tried reaching out to @gweis who maintained isodate to get him to hand it over to
Hugo van Kemenade who is maintaining isodate2 but so far no luck. I sent and inquiry to Griffith University yesterday also but they have not responded either.

[nicholascar]

Thanks for the diagnosis @aucampia: I haven't come back to this after just adding in the 3.10 instructions.

How do you figure out @gweis was at Griffith Uni?? That's just down the road from where I live and I've even supervised students from that uni!

Actually, I think he works for TERN Australia now, same place as @edmondchuc who is a regular rdflib contributor!!! I'll ask Edmond.

[aucampia]

How do you figure out @gweis was at Griffith Uni?? That's just down the road from where I live and I've even supervised students from that uni!

I saw it on Gerhard Weis's linkedin (where I also reached out) but it may not be current anymore, would be good to get hold of him though.

[nicholascar]

Here he is: https://www.tern.org.au/team/!! I've tried to contact him just now via his new employment. What a coincidence that he now works for TERN! I've worked with TERN a lot for many years. I'll easily get hold of him, even if I have to go and visit him in person. Can you please email me your email address at nick@kurrawong.net?

[aucampia]

. Can you please email me your email address at ...

Sent now, hope it did not end in spam.

[nicholascar]

restarting tests

[nicholascar]

@aucampia any idea why this is still failing? It seems to always fall over due to the error ERROR: pid 89 (fuseki-normal) not running anymore .... That sounds intermittent but it happens every time for Py310 and only Py310. Is it something to do with execution time?

Also, why do we have CICT on PR and also Push? They seem to be testing for the same things.

[aucampia]

@aucampia any idea why this is still failing? It seems to always fall over due to the error ERROR: pid 89 (fuseki-normal) not running anymore .... That sounds intermittent but it happens every time for Py310 and only Py310. Is it something to do with execution time?

It is failing because there is no JDK/JRE in the image that you use, adding this line before running with-fuseki will fix it:

  - apt-get update && apt-get install -y openjdk-11-jdk-headless

https://drone.rdflib.ashs.dev/RDFLib/rdflib/751/4/2

738	ERROR: pid 89 (fuseki-normal) not running anymore ...
100s
739	declare -- fuseki_pid_normal="89"
100s
740	declare -- fuseki_pid_tdb="90"
100s
741	INFO: killing pid 89 (fuseki-normal)
100s
742	./with-fuseki.sh: line 54: kill: (89) - No such process
100s
743	INFO: pid 89 (fuseki-normal) is dead 
100s
744	INFO: killing pid 90 (fuseki-tdb)
100s
745	INFO: pid 90 (fuseki-tdb) is dead 
100s
746	dumping fuseki_log_normal=./var/apache-jena-fuseki-3.17.0/run-normal/out.log
100s
747	Cannot find a Java JDK.
100s
748	Please set either set JAVA or JAVA_HOME and put java (>=1.8) in your PATH.
100s
749	dumping fuseki_log_tdb=./var/apache-jena-fuseki-3.17.0/run-tdb/out.log
100s
750	Cannot find a Java JDK.
100s
751	Please set either set JAVA or JAVA_HOME and put java (>=1.8) in your PATH.

I will tune the error message there a bit to indicate the reason for failure can be found in the log lines that follow.

Also, why do we have CICT on PR and also Push? They seem to be testing for the same things.

I'm a bit new to github actions still, I will make a PR to tune this a bit, I think the on-block should be changed to this - ideally we want it to run on PRs, and every push to main,

on:
  push:
    branches: ["main"]
  pull_request:
    branches: ["main"]

[aucampia]

See:

• Fix pipeline triggers #1511
• Improve error messages from with-fuseki.sh #1510

[aucampia]

Change looks good, I added two suggestions though to fix the build and variable that was renamed.

[nicholascar]

Changes made as requested and tests pass, so I'll merge without a follow-up review!