Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RGF to CRAN Task View on Machine Learning? #284

Closed
jameslamb opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Add RGF to CRAN Task View on Machine Learning? #284

jameslamb opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@jameslamb
Copy link
Contributor

@mlampros I think you should consider contacting the maintainer of the CRAN Task View on Machine Learning and getting RGF package added!

These task views are one way that people discover new libraries to try. Getting added here is a low-effort way to possibly increase the popularity of RGF.

Consider it 😀

@StrikerRUS
Copy link
Member

@mlampros Can you please help with this?

@jameslamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would do it for you, but I think it has to be the maintainer

@mlampros
Copy link
Collaborator

mlampros commented Feb 18, 2019

@jameslamb, @StrikerRUS,

I think this is a bad idea. The RGF R package should target a specific group of users. Only those users should be aware and have access to the RGF package.
I'm joking, I just sent an e-mail to Torsten.Hothorn@r-project.org. Once I get an answer I'll update this thread.

@mlampros
Copy link
Collaborator

@jameslamb @StrikerRUS,

I received a reply from two contributors of the R-project.org (Torsten Hothorn, Achim Zeileis) and from now on the RGF package will appear in the CRAN Task View: Machine Learning & Statistical Learning

@StrikerRUS
Copy link
Member

Wow, awesome! 🌟

image

Thank you very much, guys!

Also, notifying @fukatani about this cool occurrence.

I suppose this issue can be closed now, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants