Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DigiByte got updated, Please Update Networks.py files #57

Open
StormMiner opened this issue Feb 24, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

DigiByte got updated, Please Update Networks.py files #57

StormMiner opened this issue Feb 24, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@StormMiner
Copy link

Hi Rav,

Digibyte got updated to v2.0, they made quite a few changes (mainly the rewards and the difficulty re-targeting)

https://github.com/digibyte/DigiByteProject/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L833

What amends do you think should be made to the networks.py files?
The Digibyte difficulty retargeting and rewards will kick in next friday, so the p2pool operators have enough time to update to the new networks.py files.

Thanks in advance!
-Storm

@StormMiner
Copy link
Author

So its sort of like this: For Every 10080 Blocks after the 67200th Block: the Reward is reduced by 0.5%

What do you think, Rav?

@makishart
Copy link

Hi,
I dont think that makes any difference the diff re-targeting for the networks.py

Also I don't think that there is an option for 0.5% reward reducing.
So far the option is to set the halving block not to add a persentage.
Also as far as I know this is not a problem for p2pool as it scans for the reward amount itself.
Maybe in a future development of p2pool to be available more options.

I think p2pools will go smoothly on digishield :D

@StormMiner
Copy link
Author

We should at least remove the block halving code, right?
from bitcoin/networks.py

@Rav3nPL
Copy link
Owner

Rav3nPL commented Mar 1, 2014

Only time when subsidy function is used is between blocks (pool have information from another node about higher block but local daemon did not catch it yet).
We can put 1*100000000 there and it will work good (from block template) 99.9% of time :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants