-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can sort_unique()
pass along the decreasing
argument to sort()
?
#950
Comments
Yes, looks like an oversight we can fix. Maybe wait a day or three before PRing as I am trying to get 1.0.1 out of the door but I am seriously short of resources for the rev.dep. So patience is a virtue. |
Sure, I put it on my calendar to work on a week from now. I'll be out a bit next week. Thanks |
eddelbuettel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2019
* Added decreasing parameter to sort_unique() to address #950. * Allow the travis build to run for 20 minutes. * Travis wait doesn't play nicely with docker without a workaround. c.f. travis-ci/travis-ci#6934 (comment) * Add type... * Use `na.last = FALSE` to disable changing orders. Note: `unique()`'s unit test use `na.last = TRUE` because sorting was done at the R level instead of the C++ level. * Remove travis debug setup and enable only one `na.last`
Closed in #958 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It looks like
sort_unique()
is simplyunique(x).sort()
, as shown here. Would it be possible to expose thedecreasing
argument ofsort()
tosort_unique()
? I can call both separately to do this, but it seems useful to wrap the pattern completely.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: