Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline Rcpp_list6() #1049

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Inline Rcpp_list6() #1049

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

DavisVaughan
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #1048

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

eddelbuettel commented Mar 17, 2020

Thanks. I can assume you tested this R 3.3.* ? (I have some Docker containers here so I could spot check locally too.)

I am wondering if we should protect the inline para with a #define.

Edit: Never mind. Should be fine as is.

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yea, here is a {yardstick} build that previously failed, but now relies on this PR. Rcpp builds fine on an R 3.3.* build (and 3.2.*).

https://github.com/tidymodels/yardstick/runs/514069086?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:97

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

"We apologize for any invoncenience caused." Always sorry about breakage but hey, it was your colleague 😎 and we did ask for extensive pre-release tests. But I know how it goes -- CRAN releases just matter more.

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel merged commit dda407a into RcppCore:master Mar 17, 2020
@DavisVaughan DavisVaughan deleted the bugfix/list6 branch March 17, 2020 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rcpp uses Rf_list6(), which was added around R 3.4
2 participants