Skip to content

Conversation

billyy
Copy link
Contributor

@billyy billyy commented Apr 4, 2013

  1. Update javadoc on subscribe() blocking if observables are running on the same thread.
  2. Add test case with infinity observable.
  3. Add test case to unsubscribe() with all observables running in different thread (non-blocking).

abliss and others added 6 commits March 22, 2013 23:21
…e<T>>.

The old version required all of the Observable<T>s to be generated and buffered
before the concat could begin.  If the outer Observable was asynchronous, items
could be dropped (test added).  The new version passes the test, and does the
best job I could (after examining several possible strategies) of achieving
clear and consistent semantics in accordance with the principle of least
surprise.
Also restore the errant change to settings.gradle.
…on the same thread.

2.  Add test case with infinity observable.
3.  Add test case to unsubscribe() with all observables running in different thread (non-blocking).
@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

RxJava-pull-requests #75 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

Is this all good to go now @billyy and @abliss ? Are you both happy with its conformance to the .Net implementation and the various use cases we discussed on previous pull requests?

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2013
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit ce65cca into ReactiveX:master Apr 18, 2013
@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

This fixed #202

rickbw pushed a commit to rickbw/RxJava that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants