Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to handle NH3 rotators on NCO? #244

Closed
russell-taylor opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

How to handle NH3 rotators on NCO? #244

russell-taylor opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@russell-taylor
Copy link

We get a lot of messages: "Could not add MoverNH3Rotator to chain B NCO 103: MoverNH3Rotator(): Partner does not have three bonded friends" because the rotator is attached to a Cobalt that has six bonded neighbors.

Should we generalize to allow a larger number of bonded neighbors? If so, how do we ensure that the orientation starts with one that we expect rather than randomly picking the neighbor that is parallel in bonding to ours?

Asked Jane about this.

@russell-taylor
Copy link
Author

Yes, we should generalize to the larger number of neighbors. In that case, we can leave the initial orientation the same as they were placed.

@russell-taylor
Copy link
Author

These happen when running mmtbx.reduce2 output.description_file_name=4fen_new.txt D:\data\Richardsons\4fen.pdb

@russell-taylor
Copy link
Author

Modified to continue placing NH3 with >3 neighbors and not having a preference function in that case. It still tries an initial placement that is 120 degrees away from a dihedral choice, but it will move to any other better location.

@russell-taylor
Copy link
Author

The warning is in rotatable_bonds.py:axes_and_atoms_aa_specific(). It returns an empty list in that case. This does not seem to impede optimization.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant