Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.0.beta9 html5 playback broken #626

Closed
riesza opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

1.0.beta9 html5 playback broken #626

riesza opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@riesza
Copy link

riesza commented Apr 29, 2015

[Edit by myrdd] the workaround can be found in the comment below: #626 (comment)

2015-04-29_23-41-27

Latest Nightly. This appears now. Disabling blocking helps, as well as disabling the addon altogether (obviously).

From the log:
2015-04-29_23-52-31

@myrdd
Copy link
Member

myrdd commented Apr 29, 2015

You can work around this problem by manually adding a rule from host *.youtube.com to destinations with scheme mediasource. The main issue for discussing this problem is #625 #619.

@riesza
Copy link
Author

riesza commented Apr 29, 2015

Thank you, that workaround helped.

@riesza riesza closed this as completed Apr 29, 2015
@myrdd myrdd added the type: bug label May 1, 2015
@myrdd myrdd added this to the 1.0.beta11 milestone May 1, 2015
@myrdd
Copy link
Member

myrdd commented May 1, 2015

Good, so the workaround works. However, I think I will change the code so that mediasource will be treated like view-source until #625 is fixed. So I reopen this issue, and I set a milestone.

@myrdd
Copy link
Member

myrdd commented May 7, 2015

I've just figured out that the URI mediasource:https://www.youtube.com/..... is not a nested URI, so we have to live with the workaround above until #619 is fixed. Closing this issue again.

@netjeff
Copy link

netjeff commented Jul 14, 2015

Here's a screenshot that shows how to create the workaround rule discussed above:

screenshot

@myrdd
Copy link
Member

myrdd commented Jul 22, 2015

Thanks for that screenshot @netjeff. I've referenced your screenshot in the first post of this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants