Influence Effects & Hollywood Fixers on Amber Heard and 3rd Parties, Society, Organizations, Experts, Witnesses
- Open-Source Documents - Amici Organizations Filings, Official Records, & Unseen Information
Official Records of the Amber Heard Case were Opened in October 2022 to 3rd Parties with a Mandamus Order from the Court of Appeals Judges which is an essential part of due process and Legal Rights.
- Impacts to Legal Cases, Victims/Witnesses, 3rd Parties, & Society
- Part 2
Spins, Playbooks, Fixers - Confront FALSE Blackmailing to Stop It (Guide Recommendation) is to confront that information early on with full context
- Updated Data on 5 Social Media Platforms 2021-2022
Amicus Briefs were Filed with 97 Organizations and Experts Supporting Amber Heard's Appeal Directly.
- 1st Amendment and Anti-Abuse points were filed
-- E.g., The issues of abuse from their Vantage Point as opinion, rejected jury instructions on types of abuse and Amber Heard's purpose of Advocacy with an Opinion Editorial on Public Concern.
Two Amicus Briefs are linked above and nationwide it was important to make a difference.
When showing what fully happened - “The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.” ― St Augustine
It's essential for this to turn into Something Good - "focus on the future" ... This can be, in at least some ways with review for a long-term benefit. Countless organizations and people were impacted. Most cases like this are unable to be studied, and this gives that opportunity.
We hope victims of abuse can see what happened in a Perspective as a reason to do Community Aid for people abused - Despite fixers, spin, pulling both ends, and even interference with publicity.
The Truth is a Lion to be Released and we wish the best for Amber Heard, including that her friendships, career, witnesses, and life flourishes as situations and understanding improves. Amici tried to repair and bandage the case's impact.
- See Files related to this case as Discovery in "Unseen Witnesses-Victims - Playbook" Folder on how there was forcibly false framing to remove support.
- Note, social media distracted from what happened. Previous Repository was on mainly online social media impacts "Amber_Heard_Disinformation_Operations_Bots."
Updated Data from Social Media can be found on Kaggle, especially during and after, which has not been analyzed: https://www.kaggle.com/amberhearddata/datasets
With resilience, you can see Amber Heard's Good Character from an archived official website: http://web.archive.org/web/20120118112943/http://amberheardofficial.com/
-
We look forward to Amber Heard being Mera in Aquaman 2 - for domestic abuse victims everywhere and for organizations long-term, it would be positive to see her resilience.
-
The below Open Letter with over 300 Organizations and Experts was after 2 years of researching social media and after months of looking into the surface of witness interference. Long-term, it's essential to open-source what happened for ethical review.
- When facing issues where a person is trying to manipulate to edit, harm, and pull FALSE 'agent-principle' relationships to force no injunctions and silencing, one needs to CONFRONT IT. No matter what gender a person is, they should have the right to do injunctions early to stop harms before it gets worse. Unfortuneately, this case in paticular has many issues of only certain groups 'allowed' to respond which actually WORSENS the problem if not ALL 'sides' can respond.
- When a person is trying to coerce about where funds go, relationships, and so on, go forward and explain the full context early on. It only makes the problems fester and increase if refusing to respond to the problems, e.g., false and twisted blackmailing (e.g., by 'fixers' in this case procuring funds). Often blackmailers and fixers like to prey on people who are afraid to respond and who are intimidated by their information and likeness being manipulated.
Sadly this occured in this large case, which likely would never have gone to trial. AND it continues with or without any litigation. It is perpetual and a problem that Southern California/California in paticular has.
Amicus Briefs typically look at legal issues, not discovered evidence....
There were insider threats to this case, like hollywood fixers determined to destroy, and witness interference accompanying spinning donations which should have dismissed the case, and unjustly this was spun on origins with us unable to properly respond.
Those issues are ongoing, and as 3rd parties, we should consider the effect of spin doctoring and the massive amounts of evidence, Witnesses which were Available, and on our society as a whole.
What's a Hollywood Fixer? -
They've been working on cases for over 30 years, some of the most known cases of our times are the same 'fixers' and they can harm their clients by taking info, strategy, and witness names to the opposition - falsely blackmailing, pulling both ends, causing perpetual terror and chaos -
Video Series - hint, it's not just this one, and it's sadly never reported regarding this case.
- For example, the American Docuseries on Anthony Pellicano scrapes the surface - when they get into cases as insiders with false misrepresentation and the 'team' doesn't understand 'fixers,' it's horrific.
It's important to compare and contast. What happened between 2019 and 2023?
How can someone go from a winning case, and having decades of evidence and witnesses available, to practically being extorted?
Why do Press Associations previously join to protect Sources of editorials, then buckle?
How can friends of decades or years become afraid, including of false incrimination?
How can someone go from being a humanitarian to devastated, and then thankfully, life-rafted?
What are Hollywood Fixers continuing to do over years, and what's the playbook?
Where do previous witnesses go?
This GitHub seeks to point one into the direction of finding out.
Released in November, before appeals were filed for Amber Heard on November 23 -- in a struggle to catch up to both insider and online manipulation in an age where public figures utilize it, but deny it:
"Five months ago, the verdict in the defamation trial between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard deeply concerned many professionals in the fields of intimate partner and sexual violence.
As many, including A.O. Scott for The New York Times have noted, the vilification of Ms. Heard and ongoing online harassment of her and those who have voiced support for her have been unprecedented in both vitriol and scale.
Much of this harassment was fueled by disinformation, misogyny, biphobia, and a monetized social media environment where a woman’s allegations of domestic violence and sexual assault were mocked for entertainment. The same disinformation and victim-blaming tropes are now being used against others who have alleged abuse.
In our opinion, the Depp v. Heard verdict and continued discourse around it indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of intimate partner and sexual violence and how survivors respond to it. The damaging consequences of the spread of this misinformation are incalculable. We have grave concerns about the rising misuse of defamation suits to threaten and silence survivors.
We condemn the public shaming of Amber Heard and join in support of her. We support the ability of all to report intimate partner and sexual violence free of harassment and intimidation."
ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING AMBER HEARD - AND HER APPEAL:
- Women's March Action
- Women's March Foundation
- Ms. Magazine
- Esperanza United
- The National Organization for Women
- The Asian Feminist
- LIFT: Living in Freedom Together, Worcester
- Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation (CAASE)
- The Safe Center LI
- Sakhi for South Asian Women
- The National Organization for Women, Virginia Chapter
- Refuge: For women and children, against domestic violence
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative
- Center for Safety and Change
- Clearinghouse on Women's Issues (CWI)
- Center for Judicial Excellence
- Democratic Activists for Women Now
- Sanctuary for Families
- National Women’s Law Center
- Equal Rights Advocates
- Equality Now
- EnoughIsEnough Voter Project
- Engendered Collective
- Every Voice Coalition Fighting Sexual Violence on Campus
- Know Your IX
- Victim Focus
- Sisi.ie
- Aidileys
- Crumiller
- Ultraviolet
- Female Filmaker Fuse
- Sexual Violence Prevention Association
- Military Rape Crisis Center
- Öfgar
- The Pixel Project
- Hire Survivors Hollywood
- Sexual Violence Law Center
- Eris Conflict Resolution
- Hope's Door
- Futures Without Violence
- Réseau International des Mères en Lutte
- WeSpoke
- Women’s Equal Justice Project
- CCChat Magazine
- Custody Peace
- Violence Free Minnesota
- The Mary Sue
- New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault
- Osez le Féminisme
- Movement of Mothers
- Russian feminist association ONA
- The Milk Exchange
- Equal Justice Inc
- Happy Fathering Collaborative
- Me Too Many Voices Community Support Network
- Mothers of Lost Children
- Women For Change
- The White Ribbon Campaign
- Biscuit
- Projekt ECHO
- Protect Our Defenders
• Scottish Women's Aid • Bi Women Quarterly • Associazione Iroko Onlus • C.A. Goldberg, PLLC, Victims' Rights Law Firm • Feminist Majority Foundation • Fearless! Hudson Valley, Inc. • McAllister Olivarius • Aidileys • Associazione Iroko Onlus • Bi Women Quarterly • CCChat Magazine • Center for Judicial Excellence • Center for Safety and Change • Crumiller • CybHer • The Feminist Litigation Firm • Democratic Activists for Women Now • Engendered Collective • EnoughIsEnough Voter Project • Equal Justice Inc • Equal Rights Advocates • Equality Now • Eris Conflict Resolution • Esperanza United (formerly Casa de Esperanza: National Latin@ Network) • Every Voice Coalition • Family Court Crisis • Fearless! Hudson Valley, Inc. • Female Filmaker Fuse • Feminist Majority Foundation • Hope's Door • IMPACT • Konektis Belgium • LIFT: Living in Freedom Together, Worcester • McAllister Olivarius • Military Rape Crisis Center • Mothers of Lost Children • Ms. Magazine • National LGBTQ Institute on Intimate Partner Violence • The National Organization for Women • The National Organization for Women Nassau Chapter • The National Organization for Women: Virginia Chapter • National Women’s Law Center • Öfgar • Ne Molchi "Don't Be Silent" (Kazakhstan) • Ne Molchi "Don't Be Silent" (Uzbekistan) • No More • NVRDC - Network for Victim Recovery of DC • ONA • One Mom's Battle - OMB • Osez le Féminisme • Law Office of Patricia M. Pastor: Trauma Informed Justice • Réseau International des Mères en Lutte • Sakhi for South Asian Women • Sanctuary for Families • Sexual Violence Law Center • Sexual Violence Prevention Association • The Asian Feminist • The Milk Exchange • The Safe Center LI • Step Up to Family Safety • UltraViolet • UnLocal • Victim Focus • Violence Free Minnesota • Warriors C.A.R.E. • WeSpoke • The White Ribbon Campaign ( Cuyahoga County ) • Women Count USA: Femicide Accountability Project • Women For Change • ZIOS3
UPDATED DATA AVAILABLE - OPEN-SOURCE:
- Reddit: Amber Heard Data - June 2021 to Sept 2022 - 39,482 Posts Reddit (2021), 242,143 Posts Reddit (2022), 92,608 Accounts
- Instagram: Amber Heard Data from August 2021 to September 2022 (793,471 comments), 170,241 Posts on Amber Heard
- Twitter: Data of Amber Heard between April 2022 to September 2022 - 854,782 Tweets and Tweets Lite, 307,502 Accounts in the Dataset, Daily Creation of Accounts Between January to September (1062 high 4-26 to 1 low 8-18), 31,680 accounts created in 2022
- Change.org: Amber Heard Data Collected 2022 - 437 Petitions, 59,688 Comments, 4,298 Milestones (shows signature milestone timings), Graphs under "Figures" folder of partial data analysis
- YouTube: 57,958 videos on Amber Heard from YouTube Data with Comments, Metrics, Accounts
Analysis of Data Results is based on the Balance of Probabilities, not a percentage of yes or no.