Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Have you managed to improve the accuracy? #6

Closed
happyCodingSusan opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Have you managed to improve the accuracy? #6

happyCodingSusan opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@happyCodingSusan
Copy link

@RonLek , nice work! Thanks for sharing!
Wonder if you have managed to improve the accuracy while maintaining the similar speed.
@RonLek
Copy link
Owner

RonLek commented Apr 9, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@happyCodingSusan the model does take a slight hit on the accuracy in getting the speed up. It is more suited for small-sized applications that require high speed results with short model sizes and are not looking for an exacting accuracy. You can read more about it in the Conclusion part of the paper.

@RonLek RonLek closed this as completed Apr 9, 2020
@RonLek RonLek mentioned this issue Apr 17, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RonLek @happyCodingSusan