Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MISSING: Side-Effect-Access Facility #49

Closed
Fish-Git opened this issue Nov 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

MISSING: Side-Effect-Access Facility #49

Fish-Git opened this issue Nov 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
(*MOVED*) (the original issue was moved into a different issue)

Comments

@Fish-Git
Copy link
Member

Fish-Git commented Nov 28, 2017

Side-Effect-Access Facility   (September, 2017)

The side-effect-access facility may be available on a model implementing z/Architecture. When the facility is installed, the translation-exception identification (TEID) stored at real locations 168-175 during certain access exceptions contains an indication that the access was a side-effect access. A side-effect access is an implied access not directly associated with a storage operand of an instruction, is not an instruction fetch, is not a fetch of table information during ART or DAT, and is not a store of a trace entry. Additionally, when the side-effect-access facility is installed, an enhanced three-bit protection code is stored in the TEID.

@Fish-Git Fish-Git added the Missing Support for the described architectural feature is currently missing and needs to be added. label Nov 29, 2017
@Fish-Git Fish-Git added (*MOVED*) (the original issue was moved into a different issue) and removed Missing Support for the described architectural feature is currently missing and needs to be added. labels Dec 18, 2017
@Fish-Git
Copy link
Member Author

Moved to combined issue #77 "MISSING Facilities support".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
(*MOVED*) (the original issue was moved into a different issue)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant