Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

R1.2: Request to focus on tailoring the language and use cases to entry-level researchers #278

Closed
pedrohbraga opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #297
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Reviewer Comment A comment from peer review which requires a response and potentially changes to the manuscript

Comments

@pedrohbraga
Copy link
Contributor

pedrohbraga commented Nov 17, 2022

Reviewer's 1 comment:

R1.2. The title and abstract gave me the impression that the goal is to convince EEB researcher to start using GitHub. If that’s the case, it might be better to tailor the use cases to that entry level and use less GitHub specific lingo. Advanced usage may be mentioned but not detailed as much as it is currently done. E.g. collaboratively writing a paper in GitHub is probably out of the question for most. Most GitHub options for communication, discussion, issue tracking are still somewhat esoteric for most non-programmers.

Recommendations during the revision:

  1. When performing changes addressing this comment, please recall this issue (using # followed by the number of this issue) in the pull request; and,
  2. Clearly justify changes in the final comment of the pull request (to allow us to revise the manuscript in time).
@pedrohbraga pedrohbraga added the Reviewer Comment A comment from peer review which requires a response and potentially changes to the manuscript label Nov 17, 2022
@Aariq Aariq self-assigned this Nov 21, 2022
@wavingtowaves
Copy link
Contributor

wavingtowaves commented Dec 26, 2022

@Aariq do you feel like this issue is taken care of with changes we are making in response to issue #277 in PR #297

@Aariq
Copy link
Collaborator

Aariq commented Dec 28, 2022

It's definitely related. Still working on converting some barrier-like language (e.g. "more difficult", "challenging") to friendlier and more informative language reflecting that some GitHub uses require more time (e.g. "more advanced", "greater time investment") in #297

@Aariq Aariq linked a pull request Dec 28, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Reviewer Comment A comment from peer review which requires a response and potentially changes to the manuscript
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants