You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
And yes. It is on purpose. The yices format is much simpler, more compact,
less verbose, and easier to parse. The yices format also predates the 2.6 standard.
When asked for a model, yices 2 (2.6.1) produces definitions as
( (= <ident> <value>) ... )
But according to SMT-LIB 2.6 (page 47), models should look function symbol definitions, i.e.
Is this on purpose? Do you plan to produce models SMT-LIB-style in the future?
I am asking this as I am adding support for Yices 2 in the Rust SMT-LIB 2 crate rsmt2, where this discrepancy causes (relatively minor) problems.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: