You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should also use internal error codes to avoid propagating generic error codes up to the failover _recv functions. If we use internal error codes, then the topmost errors could be more descriptive.
Thank you for taking time to submit this request for SSSD. Unfortunately this issue was not given priority and the team lacks the capacity to work on it at this time.
Given that we are unable to fulfill this request I am closing the issue as wontfix.
If the issue still persist on recent SSSD you can request re-consideration of this decision by reopening this issue. Please provide additional technical details about its importance to you.
Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/2038
Document SDAP interface.
Comments
Comment from dpal at 2013-07-30 12:54:43
Fields changed
milestone: Interim Bucket => SSSD 1.12 beta
Comment from dpal at 2013-08-01 15:52:15
Fields changed
rhbz: => 0
Comment from jhrozek at 2014-05-30 16:05:34
Should be done with the LDAP refactoring planned for 1.13
milestone: SSSD 1.12 beta => SSSD 1.13 beta
Comment from jhrozek at 2014-09-16 10:51:24
The LDAP provider is in a bad need for refactoring.
priority: major => blocker
Comment from jhrozek at 2014-09-16 10:54:18
Fields changed
blockedby: => 2434
Comment from dpal at 2014-09-26 18:49:58
Fields changed
mark: => 0
Comment from jhrozek at 2015-02-10 13:35:52
It would be nice to document the sdap interface, but it's probably out of scope for 1.13
milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => SSSD 1.13 backlog
priority: blocker => major
Comment from jhrozek at 2015-02-12 20:12:57
Mass-moving tickets not planned for the 1.13 release to 1.14
milestone: SSSD 1.13 backlog => SSSD 1.14 beta
Comment from jhrozek at 2016-06-20 11:50:03
The sdap_ops.c code and the LDAP provider must be refactored, but it's too late for 1.14.
milestone: SSSD 1.14 beta => SSSD 1.15 beta
sensitive: => 0
Comment from jhrozek at 2016-06-27 14:55:44
We should also use internal error codes to avoid propagating generic error codes up to the failover _recv functions. If we use internal error codes, then the topmost errors could be more descriptive.
Comment from dpal at 2017-02-24 14:24:00
Metadata Update from @dpal:
Comment from thalman at 2020-03-13 13:49:56
Metadata Update from @thalman:
Comment from pbrezina at 2020-03-24 14:11:35
Thank you for taking time to submit this request for SSSD. Unfortunately this issue was not given priority and the team lacks the capacity to work on it at this time.
Given that we are unable to fulfill this request I am closing the issue as wontfix.
If the issue still persist on recent SSSD you can request re-consideration of this decision by reopening this issue. Please provide additional technical details about its importance to you.
Thank you for understanding.
Comment from pbrezina at 2020-03-24 14:11:37
Metadata Update from @pbrezina:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: