Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc(prettifier): instructions & configuration options #950

Conversation

lacinoire
Copy link
Contributor

Added Instructions on how to use the prettifier to it's readme.
Added option to turn on specific prettifiers / minimizers.

However I couldn't get the renaming (Code2Vec, Context2Vec) to run for me.
Is there someone still / currently working on these prettifiers? 🙂

                                                                                 add usage instructions to prettifier readme
                                                                                 mention prettifier in root readme
                                                                                 add MainTest for prettifier
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2520

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 6 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 83.488%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
dspot/src/main/java/eu/stamp_project/dspot/common/test_framework/AbstractTestFrameworkDecorator.java 3 28.57%
dspot/src/main/java/eu/stamp_project/dspot/common/test_framework/TestFramework.java 3 88.37%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2519: -0.08%
Covered Lines: 4945
Relevant Lines: 5923

💛 - Coveralls

@monperrus monperrus changed the title Doc: prettifier: instructions & configuration options Doc(prettifier): instructions & configuration options Jun 10, 2020
@monperrus monperrus merged commit 78e59c6 into STAMP-project:master Jun 10, 2020
@monperrus
Copy link
Member

We love documentation PRs, good documentation is key for science, thanks a lot.

@monperrus
Copy link
Member

Is there someone still / currently working on these prettifiers? slightly_smiling_face

This is promising but still unpublished work. We have an ongoing project with @danglotb, @zhongxingyu and @bbaudry to expand and make a top paper. But, with @danglotb and @zhongxingyu 's moves to other institutions, the project is stalled for the moment.

Maybe we can reconfigure the project. Would you be interested in working on this topic?

@lacinoire
Copy link
Contributor Author

For my PhD (with @azaidman) we want to investigate how developers interact with amplified test cases (from DSpot) and how we can explain / recommend such test cases to them.
Good naming will clearly be beneficial for that, but I will probably not focus on improving the test amplification itself.
Still I'm interested in using all the capabilities DSpot already has and contributing to where I can :)

@monperrus
Copy link
Member

monperrus commented Jun 11, 2020 via email

@lacinoire lacinoire deleted the doc-dspot-prettifier-execution-instructions branch September 4, 2020 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants