Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More TODOs #93

Open
3 of 4 tasks
ErikQQY opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
3 of 4 tasks

More TODOs #93

ErikQQY opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@ErikQQY
Copy link
Member

ErikQQY commented Jul 24, 2023

With #89 finally merged, let's push BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl to the next level!🎉🎉🎉🎉

Here are some issues we need to address in the near future:

  • The code style is a little weird, we need to use a better format style for the package

  • Currently, the solving speed is very slow and didn't use any special tricks for performance, we need to speed up the defect estimation process

  • The code is not optimized, we need to do a lot of refactors to make it match the DiffEq interface

  • Add benchmarks for the existing BVP solvers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant