We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With #89 finally merged, let's push BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl to the next level!🎉🎉🎉🎉
Here are some issues we need to address in the near future:
The code style is a little weird, we need to use a better format style for the package
Currently, the solving speed is very slow and didn't use any special tricks for performance, we need to speed up the defect estimation process
The code is not optimized, we need to do a lot of refactors to make it match the DiffEq interface
Add benchmarks for the existing BVP solvers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
With #89 finally merged, let's push BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl to the next level!🎉🎉🎉🎉
Here are some issues we need to address in the near future:
The code style is a little weird, we need to use a better format style for the package
Currently, the solving speed is very slow and didn't use any special tricks for performance, we need to speed up the defect estimation process
The code is not optimized, we need to do a lot of refactors to make it match the DiffEq interface
Add benchmarks for the existing BVP solvers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: