You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that our metadata schema is over restrictive and we should explore extending it to allow users providing a custom set of parameters they would like to store as metadata.
Current suggestion is to allow one more top-level key, tags, that will store key-value pairs.
This would allow for storing arbitrary information like build number, training data identifier or training parameters.
RafalSkolasinski
changed the title
extend metadata schema to provide custom "tags"
extend metadata schema to provide a field for custom entries
Aug 27, 2020
It seems that our metadata schema is over restrictive and we should explore extending it to allow users providing a custom set of parameters they would like to store as metadata.
Current suggestion is to allow one more top-level key,
tags
, that will store key-value pairs.This would allow for storing arbitrary information like
build number
,training data identifier
ortraining parameters
.Example:
Note: this is about static
/metadata
endpoint and NOT the request tagsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: